GEORGIA MAN FACES MULTIPLE CHARGES AFTER EX-GIRLFRIEND ALLEGES CHOKING, THREATS TO KILL HER, AND PHONE THEFT, POLICE REPORT SAYS

A disturbing alleged ᴀssault in Paulding County, Georgia, has led to multiple criminal charges against Camari Burrough after his former girlfriend told authorities that he attacked her during an overnight encounter, threatened to kill her, and left with her cellphone.

According to an initial incident report attributed to the Paulding County Sheriff’s Office, the alleged ᴀssault occurred in the early hours of June 25, 2026, at a residence in the 900 block of Macland Road. The woman told investigators that she had been spending time with a friend and Burrough, her ex-boyfriend, when an attempt to reconcile allegedly turned violent.

The report describes allegations of strangulation, physical injuries, threats, and the taking of a cellphone without permission. It also documents visible marks that a deputy said were consistent with the woman’s account of being grabbed from behind.

The allegations are serious, but they remain allegations unless and until established in court. The initial report does not, by itself, determine guilt.

AN OVERNIGHT VISIT THAT ALLEGEDLY TURNED VIOLENT

The woman told investigators that she was at a friend’s home with the friend and Burrough, whom she identified as her former boyfriend.

According to her account, the friend eventually went to bed, leaving her outside on the back porch with Burrough. During that conversation, Burrough allegedly tried to persuade her to resume their relationship.

She reportedly declined, explaining that their history included what she described as warning signs or “red flags.”

The woman said that after rejecting the idea of getting back together, she turned toward the residence and attempted to go inside.

That was when the situation allegedly escalated.

According to the report, she told deputies that Burrough grabbed her around the neck from behind and restricted her ability to breathe. She further alleged that he threatened to kill her before slamming her onto a table and then onto the ground.

The woman reported suffering cuts and abrasions to multiple parts of her body, including her elbows, knees, shins, legs, and back. She also said that during the incident, her head and shoulder struck a chair.

If established in court, the alleged conduct could have serious legal consequences, particularly because the report describes both an alleged threat to kill and an ᴀssault involving the neck.

THE VICTIM SAYS SHE FOUGHT BACK AND SOUGHT HELP

The initial report states that the woman told investigators she was eventually able to fight Burrough off and get back to her feet.

She then began banging on the door in an attempt to wake her friend, who was inside the residence.

According to the account, the friend came out after the physical confrontation and unlocked the front door so Burrough could leave.

The report explains that the door had been secured with ᴅᴇᴀᴅbolts on both sides because an autistic child was inside the home. That detail was included to explain why the friend needed to unlock the door before Burrough could exit.

The woman also told deputies that she did not contact law enforcement immediately after the alleged ᴀssault.

She reportedly explained that past trauma from a previous relationship had made her frightened at the time. She later went to the Paulding County Sheriff’s Office to provide her account and seek criminal charges.

Her explanation highlights a reality that can complicate investigations into alleged domestic violence: a delay in reporting does not, by itself, establish that an allegation is false. Investigators must examine the available evidence and circumstances before reaching conclusions.

DEPUTY DOCUMENTS VISIBLE INJURIES

During the interview at the sheriff’s office, the woman showed a deputy the injuries she attributed to the alleged ᴀssault.

The report states that Deputy Valentine-Nelson arranged for Corporal Griffin, a female deputy, to pH๏τograph marks on the woman’s back in a private area to protect her privacy.

According to the narrative, Corporal Griffin observed red markings around the back of the woman’s neck and upper-back area. The deputy described the marks as appearing consistent with skin rubbing together.

The report states that the location of the markings aligned with the woman’s account that she had been grabbed from behind.

Such observations may form part of an investigation, but they do not independently establish every detail of an alleged ᴀssault. The significance of physical evidence must be ᴀssessed alongside witness statements, pH๏τographs, communications, and any other relevant material.

The police report provides a record of what the woman reported and what deputies documented during their interaction. Any final determination of criminal responsibility belongs to the judicial process.

THE MISSING PHONE BECOMES ANOTHER PART OF THE INVESTIGATION

The allegations did not end with the reported physical confrontation.

According to the report, the woman told deputies that Burrough left with her white Android smartphone without her permission.

She showed investigators Snapchat messages that she said were exchanged after the incident. In the messages described in the report, Burrough initially denied taking the phone but later allegedly acknowledged that it was at his home and asked whether he could return it.

Those messages became part of the information provided to law enforcement as investigators considered the allegation of theft.

The report indicates that the woman wanted charges pursued in connection with the alleged ᴀssault and the missing cellphone.

Communications exchanged after an incident can be relevant to an investigation, but their meaning depends on the full context and authenticity of the messages. The initial report does not replace the need to examine the underlying evidence.

CONCERNS ABOUT A POSSIBLE WEAPON AND DRUGS

The woman also reportedly told investigators that Burrough carried a weapon and frequently possessed drugs.

According to the report, she alleged that he sometimes carried approximately one to two ounces of marijuana and ecstasy.

These statements are allegations recorded by the investigating deputy. They should not be treated as independently confirmed findings about what Burrough possessed at the time of the reported incident.

Nevertheless, the information was relevant to the concerns the woman communicated to authorities.

The booking information ᴀssociated with the case lists several serious charges, including battery involving alleged substantial physical harm or visible bodily harm, aggravated ᴀssault by strangulation, theft by taking, and possession of a firearm or knife during the commission or attempted commission of certain felonies.

The listed charges also include alleged unlawful possession of a controlled substance and possession of a firearm by a person prohibited from having one because of a felony conviction or qualifying probationary status.

The precise circumstances supporting each charge, the evidence available for each allegation, and the eventual legal outcomes must be established through court records and the judicial process. A booking or charge listing is not proof of guilt.

WHY THE ALLEGATIONS ARE BEING TAKEN SERIOUSLY

The reported incident involves several distinct allegations: physical violence, strangulation, a threat to kill, visible injuries, and the unauthorized taking of property.

Allegations involving strangulation are especially concerning because pressure on the neck can cause serious injury, even when external marks appear limited. Anyone experiencing breathing difficulties, loss of consciousness, voice changes, or other symptoms after being strangled should seek urgent medical attention.

More broadly, incidents involving former partners can be difficult to navigate. A disagreement about reconciliation can become dangerous when one person allegedly refuses to respect the other’s decision or uses intimidation or violence.

The report describes the woman as having rejected Burrough’s attempt to resume their relationship before the alleged ᴀssault. That sequence is part of her account, and investigators would need to ᴀssess it alongside all other available evidence.

The case also demonstrates why prompt, careful documentation can matter. PH๏τographs, witness accounts, messages, medical records, and other evidence may help investigators establish what happened and determine whether the charges are supported.

WHAT HAPPENS NEXT?

The allegations against Camari Burrough raise serious questions about the events at the Paulding County residence in the early hours of June 25.

The initial report outlines the woman’s account, the injuries she showed deputies, and the Snapchat messages she presented concerning her missing phone. It also records her concerns about a possible weapon and drugs.

However, the report alone does not establish the final outcome of the case. The available information does not confirm a conviction or provide a complete account of subsequent court proceedings.

As the case moves through the legal system, the evidence will need to be evaluated and the allegations addressed through the appropriate process.

The most important point is that allegations of strangulation, threats, and physical violence should be taken seriously, while the presumption of innocence and the right to a fair legal process must also be respected.

If someone is in immediate danger, contacting emergency services and seeking help from trusted people or local domestic-violence support organizations can be important steps toward safety.

What are your thoughts on how authorities should handle allegations involving strangulation and threats between former partners? Share your views respectfully in the comments, while remembering that the charges must be resolved through the legal process.